Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 24;2020(9):CD013019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013019.pub2

Comparison 2. Motor imagery versus other therapies (control): effect on motor function.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
2.1 Motor function 3 130 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.24 [‐1.20, 5.69]
2.2 Subgroup analysis: post‐stroke time 2 70 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.08 [‐5.06, 9.22]
2.2.1 Subacute 1 42 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.80 [‐5.75, 2.15]
2.2.2 Chronic 1 28 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 5.50 [3.79, 7.21]
2.3 Subgroup analysis ‐ treatment dose 3 130 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.24 [‐1.20, 5.69]
2.3.1 More than 1000 minutes 2 102 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.52 [‐2.99, 4.03]
2.3.2 Less than 1000 minutes 1 28 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 5.50 [3.79, 7.21]
2.4 Subgroup analysis: forms of application of MI 3 130 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.24 [‐1.20, 5.69]
2.4.1 Visual imagery 1 42 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.80 [‐5.75, 2.15]
2.4.2 Kinesthetic imagery 1 60 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.90 [0.37, 3.43]
2.4.3 Both visual and kinesthetic imagery 1 28 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 5.50 [3.79, 7.21]