Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 17;2021(3):CD001894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub6

Carter 2003.

Study characteristics
Methods Single centre
Unclear whether power calculation performed
Published as abstract; study authors provided additional information
Participants 203 women from fertility clinic in USA
Age < 40 years
FSH < 10, ovulatory menstrual cycles, day 3 ET with good embryo quality
Women with more than 1 failed IVF cycle excluded
Interventions Laser hatching (n = 121)
vs
No hatching (n = 82)
Outcomes Clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate
Notes Additional information provided by study authors
Dropouts included for the denominator in this review
No. of embryos: AH 2.2; control 2.1
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised by computer generation on Day 3
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear; no details provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Participants not blinded or unclear
Assessor not blinded or unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated but included dropouts
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk This was a conference abstract only and was not published as a full paper, although study authors did provide additional information. Live birth was not reported
Other bias Unclear risk Conference abstract