Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 17;2021(3):CD001894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub6

Petersen 2005.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomised trial
Participants 150 women from Brazil undergoing ART cycles
All participants had 1 failed treatment cycle
Mean age: 34 years
Interventions ICSI cycles only
AH quarter‐laser thinning vs control
AH: 35 women with 1 previous implantation failure, 40 women with repeated implantation failures
Control: 35 women with 1 previous implantation failure, 40 women with repeated implantation failures
Outcomes Live birth, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy
Notes Study author response
No. of ET: mean 2.7
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random numbers table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear ‐ code ID to mask identity of participants but not clear how or who generated this
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk All women randomised appear to have been analysed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Original protocol not viewed but study authors did report on live birth
Other bias Low risk None identified