Petersen 2005.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised trial | |
Participants | 150 women from Brazil undergoing ART cycles All participants had 1 failed treatment cycle Mean age: 34 years | |
Interventions | ICSI cycles only
AH quarter‐laser thinning vs control AH: 35 women with 1 previous implantation failure, 40 women with repeated implantation failures Control: 35 women with 1 previous implantation failure, 40 women with repeated implantation failures |
|
Outcomes | Live birth, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy | |
Notes | Study author response No. of ET: mean 2.7 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers table |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear ‐ code ID to mask identity of participants but not clear how or who generated this |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All women randomised appear to have been analysed |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Original protocol not viewed but study authors did report on live birth |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified |