Esposito 1990.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | 3‐arm, non‐blinded, single‐centre, parallel‐group RCT, with 5 to 10 days of treatment and 24 hours and 14 days follow‐up after end of treatment | |
Participants |
Location: Naples, Italy Setting of recruitment and treatment: Clinic of Infectious Diseases and Otolaryngology, University of Naples Sample size:
Participant (baseline) characteristics:
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions |
Topical plus systemic ciprofloxacin (n = 20): topical ciprofloxacin, 3 drops (250 µg/ml in saline solution) locally twice a day, PLUS oral ciprofloxacin 250 mg twice a day Topical ciprofloxacin (n = 20): topical ciprofloxacin, 3 drops (250 µg/ml in saline solution) locally twice a day Oral ciprofloxacin (n = 20): oral ciprofloxacin 250 mg twice a day All interventions given for at least 5 days. Those not cured at 5 days carried on up to 10 days. Concurrent treatment: no other treatment or use of aural toileting was mentioned. |
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes of interest in the review: Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes:
|
|
Funding sources | "The ciprofloxacin tablets and powder used in this study were kindly provided by Bayer Italia Spa, Milan, Italy" | |
Declarations of interest | No information provided | |
Notes | Topical ciprofloxacin was prepared from ciprofloxacin powder in sterile saline and tested for stability and activity for 10 days. No information about inclusion of patients with bilateral disease. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Quote: "Ciprofloxacin was randomly administered according to the following schedules ..." Comment: randomisation method not clearly specified. 38/60 patients were previously unsuccessfully treated with at least 5 days of antibiotics – unclear how this was distributed across groups. 12/20 in the oral ciprofloxacin only group had Pseudomonas versus 8/20 in other groups. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no information provided. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "Group A (20 patients), 250 mg orally twice a day; group (20 patients), 3 drops containing 250ug/mL of ciprofloxacin in saline solution locally twice a day; and group C (20 patients), both the previous treatments twice a day." Comment: participants were most likely not to be blinded as the routes of administration (oral versus topical) are different among groups and it is not mentioned that placebo was used. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "Patients were clinically examined before, during (every 2‐3 days) and after the therapy" Comment: not specified who assessed the outcomes or that the assessment method was specifically standardised. "Cure" "improvement" and "failure" seem to be more of a subjective judgement. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: no dropout cases were reported. All of the patients randomised are presented in the results of the study. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: there is no protocol for the trial on clinicaltrials.gov or the EU register of clinical trials. Some of the results mentioned in the methods section are not fully presented in the results section. "Cure" or resolution of discharge is only reported at one time point, most likely 14 days after end of treatment. The other time point, 24 hours after end of treatment (i.e. 6 to 11 days), was not reported. |