Somekh 2000.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | 2‐arm, non‐blinded, parallel‐group RCT, with 10 to 14 days duration of treatment and 90 days of follow‐up post‐hospital discharge | |
Participants |
Location: Israel, single site Setting of recruitment and treatment: inpatient, at the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, E. Wolfson Medical Center (affiliated to Tel Aviv University) Sample size:
Participant (baseline) characteristics:
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention (n = 15): intravenous aztreonam 100 mg/kg/day in 3 divided doses Comparator(n = 15): intravenous ceftazidime 100 mg/kg/day in 3 divided doses Concurrent treatment: all patients had daily suction and debridement until complete cessation of discharge. Treatment was continued until 3 days after complete cessation of discharge and for at least 10 days. Treatment was discontinued if there was no sign of remission after 14 days of treatment; development of resistance of the bacteria to the antibiotic used; or appearance of a serious complication related to the drug. |
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes of interest in the review: Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes:
|
|
Funding sources | No information provided | |
Declarations of interest | No information provided | |
Notes |
Unit of randomisation: person Methods for reporting outcomes of patients with bilateral disease: not reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "Patients were initially randomly assigned..." Comment: no details provided. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no details provided about allocation concealment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "this prospective, open, randomized study." Comment: no blinding. Unclear how this could have affected treatment. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: open‐label study. There is subjectivity in the assessment of outcome. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: no dropout was reported. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: study protocol not found. Insufficient information to judge. |