Cho 1997.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | QUOTE: "Treatment order was arranged from computer generated numbers" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | QUOTE: "by a coauthor who did not participate in observations" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | QUOTE: "Double blinded" and "were unknown by the observers and patients" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double blind, patients made self‐evaluations, base creams ""were unknown by the observers and patients" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All enrolled patients completed the trial and were analysed. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Baseline and post interventions results fully reported Intervention level data report with patient level graphical comparison comparisons provided. Correlation may inflate standard error. Carry‐over effects unlikely due to washout periods. |
Other bias | Low risk | No evidence of publication, funding, or other confounding bias |