Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 21;2021(3):CD012799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012799.pub2

Gameel 2013.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: single‐blind, parallel‐group randomized controlled trial
Setting/country: Urology Department, Tanta University Hospitals, Tanta, Egypt
Dates study conducted: November 2009 to January 2012
Participants Inclusion criteria:
  • Men with PE for > 1 year and who had an IELT of < 2 minutes in > 75% of episodes of vaginal sexual intercourse over a 2‐week period


Exclusion criteria:
  • IIEF‐5 score of < 22

  • Unstable relationship with the partner

  • Drug abuse

  • Medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, urogenital diseases, hepatic or renal impairments

  • Receiving medication for psychiatric problems


Total number of participants randomized: 150
Total length of study: 4 weeks
Group 1 (paroxetine):
  • Number of participants randomized: 30

  • Age: NR

  • Baseline IELT (mean): 69.6 (SD 28.1) seconds


Group 2 (placebo):
  • Number of participants randomized: 30

  • Age: NR

  • Baseline IELT (mean): 61.3 (SD 30.5) seconds

Interventions Group 1: paroxetine 20 mg on‐demand + lubricating jelly
Group 2: placebo on‐demand + lubricating jelly
Outcomes Primary outcomes:
  • IELT

  • How measured: reported

  • Time points measured: 0, 4 weeks


Secondary outcomes:
  • Sexual satisfaction

  • How measured: participant‐reported using sexual satisfaction scale (0–5)

  • Time points measured: 0, 4 weeks


Safety outcomes:
  • Adverse effects

  • How measured: reported by participants

  • Time point measured: 4 weeks

Funding sources None
Declarations of interest None
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Sequence created from "shuffling coded cards."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Methods not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Personnel not blinded.
Quote: "single blind study."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Participant‐reported outcomes Low risk Appropriate use of placebo, participants likely blinded.
Quote: "Group 5 was a placebo arm and received oral multivitamin pills 1–4 h before intercourse. To ensure that patients were unaware of the drug used, those receiving oral medication were also given local penile lubricating jelly before intercourse, whilst group 4 was also given oral multivitamin pills 1–4 h before intercourse."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Investigator‐assessed outcomes High risk Assessors unlikely blinded.
Quote: "single blind study."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
IELT Low risk Objective measurement that was unlikely to be influenced by blinding.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Low proportion of missing data (28/30 (94%) in SSRI arm and 27/30 (90%) in placebo arm included in final analysis).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol available.
Other bias Low risk No additional sources of bias identified.