Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 21;2021(3):CD012799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012799.pub2

McMahon 2010.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: blinded, randomized controlled, parallel‐group trial
Setting/country: multicenter in Asia Pacific
Dates study conducted: March 2005 to June 2006
Participants Inclusion criteria:
  • Age ≥ 18 years

  • In a stable, monogamous heterosexual relationship for ≥ 6 months

  • Planning to maintain this relationship for the duration of the study

  • PE according to DSM‐IV‐TR criteria for PE for ≥ 6 months prior to enrolment and had a baseline IELT ≤ 2 minutes in ≥ 75% of a minimum of 4 evaluable sexual intercourse events during a treatment‐free 4‐week baseline period, and reported at least "moderate" ejaculation‐related personal distress or interpersonal difficulty


Exclusion criteria:
  • History of medical or psychiatric illness, including uncontrolled hypertension, hyperprolactinemia or untreated hypothyroidism

  • History of medical events that were associated with the onset of PE

  • Sexual dysfunction in either partner except PE in the man (including a history of ED based on an IIEF Erectile Function domain score < 21 at screening)

  • History of HIV, HBsAg or hepatitis C (except for people from Korea, inactive HBsAg carriers with normal liver function tests were allowed into the trial)

  • Concomitant use of SSRIs or tricyclic antidepressants

  • Known hypersensitivity to SSRIs or serotonin‐norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors


Total number of participants randomized: 1067
Total length of study: 12 weeks
Group 1 (dapoxetine 30 mg):
  • Number of participants randomized: 354

  • Age (mean): 41.2 (SD 10.74) years

  • Baseline IELT (mean): 3.9 minutes

  • Number of participants with primary PE: 92 (42.2%)


Group 2 (dapoxetine 60 mg):
  • Number of participants randomized: 356

  • Age (mean): 41.0 (SD 10.78) years

  • Baseline IELT (mean): 4.2 minutes

  • Number of participants with primary PE: 92 (42.2%)


Group 3 (placebo):
  • Number of participants randomized: 357

  • Age (mean): 40.6 (SD 9.71) years

  • Baseline IELT (mean): 2.4 minutes

  • Number of participants with primary PE: 96 (45.9%)

Interventions Group 1: dapoxetine 30 mg on‐demand
Group 2: dapoxetine 60 mg on‐demand
Group 3: placebo on‐demand
Outcomes Primary outcomes:
  • IELT

  • How measured: by female partner using a stopwatch

  • Time points measured: 0, 4, 8, 12 weeks


Secondary outcomes:
  • Participant‐reported outcome measures

  • How measured: CGIC in PE and PEP questionnaires

  • Time points measured: every 4 weeks


Safety outcomes:
  • Adverse effects

  • How measured: reported by participants

  • Time points measured: anytime

Funding sources Study funded by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Declarations of interest Dr McMahon is a consultant/investigator for Johnson & Johnson. Drs Kim, Park and Chang are investigators for Johnson & Johnson. Drs Rivas, Tesfaye, Rothman and Aquilina are employees of Johnson & Johnson.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Methods not described.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Methods not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Study described as double‐blind; no further information.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Participant‐reported outcomes Low risk Likely appropriate blinding, "double‐blind" and placebo was used.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Investigator‐assessed outcomes Unclear risk Not explicitly described.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
IELT Low risk Objective measurement that was unlikely to be influenced by blinding.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk 62/395 (17%) in placebo, 70/354 (20%) in dapoxetine 30 mg, 77/356 (22%) in dapoxetine 60 mg were not included in the analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk As reported in protocol in ClinicalTrials.gov.
Other bias Low risk No additional sources of bias identified.