McMahon 2010.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Study design: blinded, randomized controlled, parallel‐group trial Setting/country: multicenter in Asia Pacific Dates study conducted: March 2005 to June 2006 |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Total number of participants randomized: 1067 Total length of study: 12 weeks Group 1 (dapoxetine 30 mg):
Group 2 (dapoxetine 60 mg):
Group 3 (placebo):
|
|
Interventions | Group 1: dapoxetine 30 mg on‐demand Group 2: dapoxetine 60 mg on‐demand Group 3: placebo on‐demand |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes:
Safety outcomes:
|
|
Funding sources | Study funded by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA. | |
Declarations of interest | Dr McMahon is a consultant/investigator for Johnson & Johnson. Drs Kim, Park and Chang are investigators for Johnson & Johnson. Drs Rivas, Tesfaye, Rothman and Aquilina are employees of Johnson & Johnson. | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Methods not described. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Methods not described. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Study described as double‐blind; no further information. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Participant‐reported outcomes | Low risk | Likely appropriate blinding, "double‐blind" and placebo was used. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Investigator‐assessed outcomes | Unclear risk | Not explicitly described. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) IELT | Low risk | Objective measurement that was unlikely to be influenced by blinding. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 62/395 (17%) in placebo, 70/354 (20%) in dapoxetine 30 mg, 77/356 (22%) in dapoxetine 60 mg were not included in the analysis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | As reported in protocol in ClinicalTrials.gov. |
Other bias | Low risk | No additional sources of bias identified. |