Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 21;2021(3):CD012799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012799.pub2

Yilmaz 1999.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: blinded, randomized controlled, parallel‐group trial
Setting/country: Department of Urology and Neurology, Erciyes University Medical Faculty, Gevher Nesiber Research and Training Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey
Dates study conducted: January 1997 to November 1997
Participants Inclusion criteria:
  • Not clearly described: men with PE (defined as uncontrolled occurrence of ejaculation just before or in the first few minutes of vaginal penetration)


Exclusion criteria:
  • Impotence

  • Excessive alcohol intake or drug abuse

  • Presence of psychopathology, mental retardation or organic disorder


Total number of participants randomized: 40
Total length of study: 1 month
Group 1 (fluoxetine):
  • Number of participants randomized: 20

  • Age (mean): 36.5 (range 22–56) years

  • Baseline IELT (mean): 1.2 (SD 1.0) minutes


Group 2 (placebo):
  • Number of participants randomized: 20

  • Age (mean): 37.3 (range 24–58) years

  • Baseline IELT (mean): 1.1 (SD 1.1) minutes

Interventions Group 1: fluoxetine 20 mg daily
Group 2: placebo daily
Outcomes Primary outcomes:
  • IELT

  • How measured: by participant according to participant choice

  • Time points measured: 0, 4 weeks


Secondary outcomes:
  • Penile sensory threshold

  • How measured: using ring electrode and electromyography machine

  • Time points measured: 0, 4 weeks


Safety outcomes:
  • Adverse effects

  • How measured: reported by participants

  • Time points measured: anytime


Other outcomes:
  • Cortical sensory threshold

  • How measured: using ring electrode and electromyography machine

  • Time points measured: 0, 4 weeks


Other outcomes:
  • Sacral‐evoked response test

  • How measured: using ring electrode and electromyography machine

  • Time points measured: 0, 4 weeks

Funding sources NR
Declarations of interest NR
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Methods not described.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Methods not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Study described as "double blind," but not clear whether personnel who interviewed participants at the end regarding adverse effects were blinded.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Participant‐reported outcomes Low risk Likely appropriately blinded.
Quote: "control group received placebo."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Investigator‐assessed outcomes Unclear risk Not explicitly described.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
IELT Low risk Objective measurement that was unlikely to be influenced by blinding.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Number of participants included in the final analysis was not clearly described.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol available.
Other bias Low risk No additional sources of bias identified.

CGI: Clinical Global Impression; CGIC: Clinical Global Impression of Change; DSM‐IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition; DSM‐IV‐TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision; ED: erectile dysfunction; HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen; IELT: intravaginal ejaculatory latency time; IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function; ITT: intention to treat; NR: not reported; PDE5: phosphodiesterase‐5; PE: premature ejaculation; PEP: Premature Ejaculation Profile; SCL‐90: Symptom Checklist‐90; SD: standard deviation; SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.