Study	Reason for exclusion
Calabrese 2012	Irrelevant intervention: did not involve notification or tracking of stock levels.Tracking of medication location from order to delivery. Also, unclear if mobile devices were used ('web‐based') and study was not set in primary care.
Chaffee 2010	Irrelevant study design: editorial, narrative review on computerised prescriber order entry system alerts
Chiu 2019	Irrelevant intervention: did not involve notification or tracking of stock levels
Fisher 2018	Irrelevant intervention: not accessible by, nor primarily used by mobile
Hazel 2015	Irrelevant study design: literature review of malaria research in Malawi
Nzolo 2018	Irrelevant intervention: did not involve notification or tracking of stock levels
Okoli 2015	Irrelevant study design: Measured outcomes once before and 3 times after intervention, study was not controlled
Patel 2006	Irrelevant study design: described pilot and production phases of development of pharmacy tool, no control group or comparison was made
Peek 2016	Irrelevant study design: not primary care
Rao 2013	Irrelevant study design: narrative review
Tamblyn 2010	Irrelevant intervention: did not involve notification or tracking of stock levels
Umlauf 2017	Irrelevant study design: paper reports on handling of stockout situations, no evaluation of any intervention
Williams 2018	Irrelevant intervention: did not involve notification or tracking of stock levels
Wolfe 2017	Irrelevant study design: commentary, advice, guideline on pharmacy data management
Zablotska 2018	Irrelevant study design: editorial