Goldhaber 1996.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised controlled trial to assess efficacy and safety of rUK compared to heparin alone September 1992 to April 1994 361 screened, total randomised: 17 Allocation on 1:1 basis on morning of treatment Open labelled study Written informed consent |
|
Participants | Country: USA
Participants: 17
Symptoms of DVT < 14 days
Age: > 18 years Sex: Male and female Inclusion criteria: DVT diagnosed by ultrasonography or venography for proximal lower extremity (popliteal,femoral, iliac veins with or without calf vein thrombosis) or MRI for upper extremity (brachial, axillary, subclavian, internal jugular veins) Exclusion criteria: stroke, intracranial disease or trauma, major chronic bleeding, major GI bleeding within one year, major urological bleeding 1 month, trauma or major surgery at non‐compressible site within 14 days, hypertension > 180/110 mmHg, haematocrit < 25% or platelet count < 100,000/mm3, pregnancy, nursing mothers, occult blood in stool, gross haematuria |
|
Interventions | Recombinant urokinase group: 3 bolus infusions of 250,000 U in 5 mins via peripheral vein followed by continuous infusion of 750,000 U over 25 mins and 8 hours after initial dose. Final dose 24 hours after initial dose. Heparin administered 12 hours after first rUK dose for 12 hours until final rUK dose. Three hours after final rUK hep resumed to maintain activated PPT time of 60 to 80 seconds. Warfarin started the same evening to maintain INR of 2 to 3 Heparin group: initial bolus of 5000 to 10,000 U if they were not already receiving IV hep, then continuous infusion adjusted to maintain activated PPT time of 60 to 80 seconds. First dose of warfarin given within 24 hours of randomisation, target INR was 2 to 3 |
|
Outcomes | Clot lysis, venous flow, blood count and bleeding complications, fibrinogen levels | |
Funding | "Supported, in part, by a grant from Abbott Laboratories. Dr. Goldhaber receives support from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Academic Award in Systemic and Vascular Medicine (HL 02663)." | |
Declaration of interests | ‐ | |
Notes | 1 patient in each group had upper extremity DVT UK group had longer duration of symptoms (6 days versus 3 days) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation method not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Open label |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No details given but judged low risk as outcome assessment well described |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "...images compared and assessed by vascular panel blinded to randomization assignment and time point of image" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All data reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | None |