Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 19;2021(1):CD002783. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002783.pub5

Ugurlu 2002.

Study characteristics
Methods Prospective study to compare efficacy and safety of low dose, slow infusion thrombolysis
Randomised
Participants Country: Turkey
Age: 18 to 70 years
Number: 97, 50 low dose strep, 47 hep
June 1995 to May 1999
Sex: Male and female
Informed consent
Baseline characteristics similar
Inclusion criteria: DVT confirmed with high resolution colour duplex
Exclusion criteria: history of stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, major GI, urological ir genital haemorrhage, major trauma or surgery within 20 days, hypertension, known bleeding diathesis, post partum, nursing or pregnant women
Interventions Strepokinase group: Methylprednisone 250 mg IV with IV antihistaminic prior to 250,000 U given in 30 mins via forearm vein, then infusion of 100,000 U/hour. Infusion stopped when a dose of 1,500,000 U. Then heparin according to prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times and duplex study done. Urokinase administered in 2 patients who had severe allergic reaction to strep ‐ bolus of 100,000 U then infusion of 100,000 U per hour for a total dose of either 1,500,000 or 3,000,000 U
Heparin group: bolus of 5000 U, then infusion of 1‐1500 U/hr. Dose adjusted according to the activated partial thromboplastin time
Both groups: bed rest and elevation, coumadin started 48 hours later according to prothrombin times, INR of 2 ‐ 3
Outcomes Venous flow, clinical assessment, haemorrhagic complications, allergic reaction
Funding Not reported
Declaration of interests Not reported
Notes Recurrent DVT included (30% each group)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Randomised number table"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Not possible but judged low risk as outcome assessment well described
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk "...initial and post‐treatment duplex studies preformed by same radiologist unaware of groups.."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk All accounted for
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk None