2. Payment methods for the vulnerable populations.
Target population | Payment methods | Outcomes |
The elderly | Not reported in included studies | Not reported in included studies |
The disabled | Not reported in included studies | Not reported in included studies |
Minorities | Not reported in included studies | Not reported in included studies |
People with low levels of education | Not reported in included studies | Not reported in included studies |
Children | ||
Clarkson 2008, cluster‐randomised trial | FFS remuneration | Children with 1 or more sealant per dentist |
Davidson 1992, randomised trial | Capitation, FFS high rate compare with FFS (low rates) | Physician visits, hospitalisations |
Jensen 2014, controlled before‐after study | Mixed system of capitation and FFS contracts | Birth weight, preterm birth, very preterm birth, fetal growth |
Singh 2015, controlled before‐after study | Performance bonus | Weight, WHO malnourished status |
Women | ||
Bilardi 2010, cluster randomised trial | P4P (a small incentive payment per test) | Women being tested |
People living in rural or remote areas | ||
Yesalis 1980; Yesalis 1984, controlled before‐after study | Capitation compare with FFS | Rate of generic substitution per 100 prescriptions Percentage of Medicaid prescriptions classified as multi‐source drug products Numbers of prescriptions involving changes in labeller on refills (0 to 5 days) |
Low‐income populations 2 | ||
Christensen 2000, randomised trial, Medicaid recipients | Financial incentive (P4P) | Patients receiving cognitive services |
Gleeson 2017, controlled before‐after study, Medicaid | P4P plus existing FFS compare with FFS | Adolescent well care, inactivated polio vaccine |
FFS: fee‐for‐service P4P: pay for performance WHO: World Health Organization