Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 20;2021(1):CD011865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011865.pub2

2. Payment methods for the vulnerable populations.

Target population Payment methods Outcomes
The elderly Not reported in included studies Not reported in included studies
The disabled Not reported in included studies Not reported in included studies
Minorities Not reported in included studies Not reported in included studies
People with low levels of education Not reported in included studies Not reported in included studies
Children
Clarkson 2008, cluster‐randomised trial FFS remuneration Children with 1 or more sealant per dentist
Davidson 1992, randomised trial Capitation, FFS high rate compare with FFS (low rates) Physician visits, hospitalisations
Jensen 2014, controlled before‐after study Mixed system of capitation and FFS contracts Birth weight, preterm birth, very preterm birth, fetal growth
Singh 2015, controlled before‐after study Performance bonus Weight, WHO malnourished status
Women
Bilardi 2010, cluster randomised trial P4P (a small incentive payment per test) Women being tested
People living in rural or remote areas
Yesalis 1980; Yesalis 1984, controlled before‐after study Capitation compare with FFS Rate of generic substitution per 100 prescriptions
Percentage of Medicaid prescriptions classified as multi‐source drug products
Numbers of prescriptions involving changes in labeller on refills (0 to 5 days)
Low‐income populations 2
Christensen 2000, randomised trial, Medicaid recipients Financial incentive (P4P) Patients receiving cognitive services
Gleeson 2017, controlled before‐after study, Medicaid P4P plus existing FFS compare with FFS Adolescent well care, inactivated polio vaccine

FFS: fee‐for‐service
P4P: pay for performance
WHO: World Health Organization