BREVAS 2018.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: double‐blind parallel RCT (initially planned as phase 3 trial) Location: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Russian Federation, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States Setting: Not reported Number of centres: 37 Time frame of the study: 20 March 2013 through 06 February 2017 Duration of follow‐up: approximately up to 4 years |
|
Participants |
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Total number of participants: 106 participants randomised, Belimumab group N = 53, Placebo group N = 52, N = 1 participant randomised in error Characteristics: GPA 79%, MPA 21% (The results of MPA patients were added to the GPA patient analysis) Mean (SD) age: Belimumab 56 ± 14, Placebo 54 ± 14 Female sex: Belimumab 49.1%, Placebo 48.1% CrCl value: NR Disease duration (time since diagnosis, median(SD)): Belimumab 2.3 years (range 0.3‐14.9), placebo 1.3 years (0.01‐20.6) Age at onset of symptoms: NR Race/ethnic group: Belimumab: African American/African Heritage 1, American Indian or Alaskan Native 6, Central/South Asian Heritage 0, White 46. Placebo: African American/African Heritage 1, American Indian or Alaskan Native 5, Central/South Asian Heritage 2, White 44 Disease diagnosed at the enrolment of the study: NR Disease assessment index BVAS (mean(SD)): NR Damage index: NR Global assessment: NR Quality of life: NR Disease severity (limited vs severe): NR Organ involvement: NR Prior treatment: NR ANCA type: anti‐PR3 77%, anti‐MPO 23% |
|
Interventions |
Belimumab group: Belimumab 10 mg/kg administered intravenously over 1 hour, on days 0, 14, 28 and every 28 days thereafter until 12 months after the last participant was randomised (In Belgium‐ all participants received belimumab at dose 10mg/day every 28 days until Week 24, and a final evaluation was at Week 28). Placebo group: Placebo administered intravenously over 1 hour on days 0, 14, 28 and every 28 days thereafter until 12 months after the last participant was randomised. (In Belgium‐only open‐label extension, all participants received belimumab 10mg/day every 28 days until Week 24, and a final evaluation was at Week 28). Mean or median treatment duration not reported. Description of treatment and concomitant treatment: All participants received oral azathioprine at a target dose of 2 mg/kg/day. |
|
Outcomes |
Major outcomes:
Minor outcomes:
Other outcomes:
At double‐blind Week 48 of year 1 and double‐blind Week 28 (specified in protocol) of year 2 and by visit;
|
|
Notes |
Discontinuation: 32 (9.52%) participants (12 participants from placebo group and 20 participant from belimumab group): 10 (9.52%) due to AEs, 11 (10.48%) lack of efficacy, 1 (0,95%) protocol violation, 2 (1.9%) other‐study closed/terminated, 5 (4.76%) physician decision, 3 (2.86%) consent withdrawal. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline The study was initially planned as phase 3 trial with planned enrolment of approximately 300, then it ws changed to exploratory trial with enrolment of approximately 100 patients, the design changed from "event‐driven" to "fixed completion” specified as 12 months after the randomisation of the last patient. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "A total of 164 participants were screened and 106 were enrolled and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive placebo or belimumab" ‐ information from EudraCT and clinicaltrials.gov. Authors reported the use of interactive web response system so it was assumed that the sequence generation was computed based. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Central randomisation: Use of interactive web response system |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)" ‐ information from EudraCT and clinicaltrials.gov. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)" ‐ information from EudraCT and clinicaltrials.gov. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | ITT was performed (all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study drug) and all patients were included in primary analysis, no missing outcome data identified, all reasons of withdrawn were described. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Full protocol available; not all outcomes specified in protocol were reported (see in the description of outcomes). |
Other bias | Low risk | No other biases were identified. |