Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 4;2021(2):CD011184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3

Summary of findings 2. Fresh compared to frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction regarding pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Fresh compared to frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction regarding pregnancy and neonatal outcomes (cumulatively and after first embryo transfer)
Patient or population: women undergoing assisted reproduction
Setting: assisted reproduction clinic
Intervention: frozen embryo transfers only
Comparison: fresh and frozen embryo transfers (conventional IVF)
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) № of participants
(studies) Quality of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Risk with fresh and frozen embryo transfers Risk with frozen embryo transfer only
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: cumulatively 26 per 1000 18 per 1000
(7 to 46) OR 0.70
(0.27 to 1.82) 782
(1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b  
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: after first ET 15 per 1000 31 per 1000
(21 to 46) OR 2.15
(1.42 to 3.25) 3940
(3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b  
Large for gestational age (birth weight above 90th percentile): cumulatively 10 per 1000 20 per 1000
(6 to 60) OR 1.97
(0.63 to 6.15) 782
(1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b  
Large for gestational age (birth weight above 90th percentile): after first ET 42 per 1000 79 per 1000
(62 to 100) OR 1.96
(1.51 to 2.55) 3940
(3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b,c  
Small for gestational age (birth weight below 10th percentile): cumulatively 46 per 1000 17 per 1000
(8 to 37) OR 0.36
(0.16 to 0.80) 782
(1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,b  
Small for gestational age (birth weight below 10th percentile): after first ET 82 per 1000 68 per 1000
(55 to 86) OR 0.82
(0.65 to 1.05) 3940
(3 RCTs) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b,c  
Birth weight of babies born: singletons   MD 127.4 g higher
(77.1 higher to 177.1 higher) 1607
(5 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatea  
Birth weight of babies born: multiples   MD 49.5 g higher
(21.1 lower to 120.1 higher) 804
(4 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa,c  
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; IVF: in vitro fertilisation; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

aDowngraded one level due to serious risk of bias associated with lack of power calculation (unclear what determined end of study) and/or use of interim analysis that was calculated per transfer (unit of analysis error) with absence of adequate stopping rules (possible overestimation of treatment effect).
bDowngraded one level due to serious imprecision: event rate: less than 300.
cDowngraded one level due to serious unexplained heterogeneity.