Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 4;2021(2):CD011184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
Absalan 2013 Unclear from report whether study was a RCT, and the authors did not respond to our request for further information.
Aflatoonian 2010 This article has been retracted from the literature at the request of the Editor and the ASRM Publications Committee.
Beyer 2016 Wrong study design (retrospective cohort)
Boostanfar 2016 Randomised a different intervention
Chandel 2016 Wrong study design (pseudo‐RCT)
Magdi 2017 Wrong study design (prospective cohort)
Simon 2020 Wrong comparison
Yang 2015 One‐third of participants chose to be in group 3 after randomisation. Not considered a properly randomised RCT.

ASRM: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; RCT: randomised controlled trial