Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Absalan 2013 | Unclear from report whether study was a RCT, and the authors did not respond to our request for further information. |
Aflatoonian 2010 | This article has been retracted from the literature at the request of the Editor and the ASRM Publications Committee. |
Beyer 2016 | Wrong study design (retrospective cohort) |
Boostanfar 2016 | Randomised a different intervention |
Chandel 2016 | Wrong study design (pseudo‐RCT) |
Magdi 2017 | Wrong study design (prospective cohort) |
Simon 2020 | Wrong comparison |
Yang 2015 | One‐third of participants chose to be in group 3 after randomisation. Not considered a properly randomised RCT. |
ASRM: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; RCT: randomised controlled trial