Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 29;2020(10):CD001892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001892.pub5

Di Iorio 2003.

Study characteristics
Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Study duration: not reported

  • Study follow‐up period: 24 months

Participants
  • Country: Italy

  • Setting: single centre; renal outpatient clinic

  • Patients with CrCl ≤ 25 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD stage 4) receiving low protein diet (0.6 g/kg/day) for 6 to 12 months and ESA for 6 to 12 months

  • Number: very low protein diet group (10); low protein diet group (10)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): very low protein diet group (57 ± 17); low protein diet group (52 ± 15)

  • Sex (M/F): very low protein diet group (6/4); low protein diet group (6/4)

  • Exclusion criteria: bleeding or diseases potentially affecting ESA response (i.e. neoplastic diseases, infectious diseases, severe malnutrition)

Interventions Very low protein diet group
  • Prescribed protein intake: 0.3 g protein/kg/day + keto‐analogues and essential amino acids (Alfa Kappa 1 tablet/5 kg body weight)

  • Calculated protein intake: 0.5 ± 0.01 g/kg/day at 12 months


Low protein diet group
  • Prescribed protein intake: 0.6 g protein/kg/day

  • Calculated protein intake 0.79 ± 0.02 g/kg/day at 12 months


Co‐interventions
  • Sodium restriction

  • Iron supplementation (maintain transferrin saturation > 20% and serum ferritin 100 to 500 mg/dL)

  • Antihypertensive therapy (maintain blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg)

  • 2 to 3 g/day of sodium bicarbonate, folic acid and vitamin B12 supplements

  • Phosphate binders (maintain serum phosphate levels < 5.5 mg/dL)

Outcomes
  • ESKD: end point was GFR ≤ 7 mL/min/1.73 m2 or development of uraemic complications requiring haemodialysis

  • GFR measured by CrCl

  • Body weight at 12 months

Notes
  • Three patients in each group had diabetic kidney disease

  • 3 month run‐in period before randomisation to verify stability of Hb coefficient

  • All participants required to restrict dietary sodium intake

  • Primary outcome was % reduction in ESA dose

  • Funding source: not reported

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Not blinded and lack of blinding may influence patient management
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): End or change in GFR
End of change in GFR Low risk Outcome was based on laboratory outcome and unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): Need to start dialysis
Need to start dialysis Unclear risk No information provided on criteria used to commence dialysis
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk All included participants accounted for
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Reported on expected outcomes (death, dialysis, GFR, body weight)
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement