Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 3;2020(12):CD013020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2

6.

6

Leaguetable of network meta‐analysis for the outcome proportion of participants with pain response. Treatment options are ranked as indicated by the arrow from top: greater chance of being the best treatment (higher P‐scores) to bottom: lower chance of being the best treatment (lower P‐score). Network estimates with 95% confidence intervals indicating an effect between two of the treatment options are marked in yellow: treatment option in column better than treatment option in row.

No. of studies: 4. No. of treatments: 5. No. of pairwise comparisons: 4. No. of designs: 4

Heterogeneity/inconsistency: Qtotal = 0, P = not available; I2 = not available; Tau2 = not available
Treatment effects + 95% confidence intervals (risk ratios, random‐effects model)