15.

Leaguetable of sensitivity network meta‐analysis including only studies with low risk of bias for outcome adverse event: renal impairment. Treatment options are ranked as indicated by the arrow from top: greater chance of being the best treatment (higher P‐scores) to bottom: lower chance of being the best treatment (lower P‐score). Network estimates with 95% confidence intervals indicating an effect between two of the treatment options are marked in yellow: treatment option in column better than treatment option in row.

No. of studies: 4. No. of treatments: 3. No. of pairwise comparisons: 4. No. of designs: 3

Q_total = 0.38, P = 0.83/Q_within = 0.00, P = 0.95/Q_between = 0.38, P = 0.54; I² = 0.0%, Tau² = 0
Treatment effects + 95% confidence intervals (risk ratios, random‐effects model).