Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 3;2020(12):CD013020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2

56.

56

Leaguetable of network meta‐analysis for the outcome mortality. Treatment options are ranked as indicated by the arrow from top: greater chance of being the best treatment (higher P‐scores) to bottom: lower chance of being the best treatment (lower P‐score). Network estimates with 95% confidence intervals indicating an effect between two of the treatment options are marked in yellow: treatment option in column better than treatment option in row. Global approach to check inconsistency/heterogeneity: Q‐statistics, I2.

No. of studies: 13. No. of treatments: 6. No. of pairwise comparisons: 13. No. of designs: 6

Qtotal = 3.35, P = 0.91/Qwithin = 3.15, P = 0.87/Qbetween = 0.20, P = 0.65; I2 = 0.0%, Tau2 = 0

Treatment effects + 95% confidence intervals (risk ratios, random‐effects model)