76.

Leaguetable of network meta‐analysis for the outcome adverse event: fatigue. Treatment options are ranked as indicated by the arrow from top: greater chance of being the best treatment (higher P‐scores) to bottom: lower chance of being the best treatment (lower P‐score). Network estimates with 95% confidence intervals indicating an effect between two of the treatment options would have been marked in yellow: treatment option in column better than treatment option in row. Global approach to check inconsistency/heterogeneity: Q‐statistics, I².

No. of studies: 7. No. of treatments: 5. No. of pairwise comparisons: 7. No. of designs: 4

Heterogeneity/inconsistency: Q_total = 2.36, P = 0.50; I² = 0.0%, Tau² = 0

Treatment effects + 95% confidence intervals (risk ratios, random‐effects model)