Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 3;2020(12):CD013020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2

ZABTON‐PC.

Study characteristics
Methods Recruitment period:
  • July 2006 to June 2011


Outcomes:
  • SREs, disease progression, adverse events


Pain assessment tool:
  • not reported


Randomization:
  • intervention vs control

Participants Eligibility criteria:
  • histologically confirmed prostate cancer and bone metastases present in bone scintigraphy

  • non‐therapy prostate cancer (possible inclusion of men with hormone therapy for < 1 month)

  • ECOG performance status ≤ 3

  • leukocyte count > 3000/mm3

  • platelet count > 100,000/mm3

  • hemoglobin level > 9 mg/dL

  • serum ALT ≥ 3 times the institutional reference

  • blood urea nitrogen (BUN) < 30 mg/dL, ≥ 3 times the institutional reference

  • serum creatinine < 3.0 mg/dL

  • serum calcium 8.5 to 11.5 mg/dL


Exclusion criteria:
  • prior use of bisphosphonates

  • radiation therapy within 3 months of therapy initiation

  • serum correction calcium values < 8.0 mg/dL or in active cancer ≥ 11.6 mg/dL

  • other active malignancy within 3 years prior to therapy initiation

  • grave complications

  • planned invasive dental treatment or a treatment within 6 months prior to study entry

  • anaphylactic medical history regarding bisphosphonates


Participants randomized:
  • 60 randomized, 29 intervention, 31 control


Mean age:
  • intervention: 71.1 years

  • control: 71.8 years


Country of participants:
  • Japan

Interventions Previous interventions:
  • participants had no prior intervention


Interventions during study period:
  • intervention: zoledronic acid 4 mg IV infusion every 4 weeks (started 1 month after combined androgen blockade), combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide 80 mg and an LHRH agonist

  • control: combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide 80 mg and an LHRH agonist

Outcomes Reported and analyzed in this review:
  • SREs

  • adverse events

Funding sources Funding sources:
  • not reported

Declarations of interest Conflicts of interest:
  • not reported

Notes Inclusion of "bone pain" in SREs
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information on sequence generation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information on allocation concealment
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
Blinding of participants High risk "This study was under a still ongoing randomized multicenter collaborative open‐labeled project [...]."
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
Blinding of personnel High risk "This study was under a still ongoing randomized multicenter collaborative open‐labeled project [...]."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Outcomes subjective to participants High risk "This study was under a still ongoing randomized multicenter collaborative open‐labeled project [...]."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Outcomes subjective to outcome assessors Unclear risk Insufficient information on blinding of outcome assessors
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Objective outcomes Low risk No known reason for bias
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Time‐to‐event data Unclear risk All participants were included in statistical analysis. 3 participants out of 60 were lost to follow‐up, and 20 participants died. No information on intention‐to‐treat analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Patient‐reported outcomes (other than safety data) Unclear risk All participants were included in statistical analysis. 3 participants out of 60 were lost to follow‐up, and 20 participants died. No information on intention‐to‐treat analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Safety data Unclear risk All participants were included in statistical analysis. 3 participants out of 60 were lost to follow‐up, and 20 participants died. No information on intention‐to‐treat analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Other outcomes Unclear risk All participants were included in statistical analysis. 3 participants out of 60 were lost to follow‐up, and 20 participants died. No information on intention‐to‐treat analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Protocol available (UMIN000001137). Survival data not reported as planned.
Other bias Low risk None identified