ZABTON‐PC.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Recruitment period:
Outcomes:
Pain assessment tool:
Randomization:
|
|
Participants | Eligibility criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Participants randomized:
Mean age:
Country of participants:
|
|
Interventions | Previous interventions:
Interventions during study period:
|
|
Outcomes | Reported and analyzed in this review:
|
|
Funding sources | Funding sources:
|
|
Declarations of interest | Conflicts of interest:
|
|
Notes | Inclusion of "bone pain" in SREs | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information on sequence generation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information on allocation concealment |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Blinding of participants | High risk | "This study was under a still ongoing randomized multicenter collaborative open‐labeled project [...]." |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Blinding of personnel | High risk | "This study was under a still ongoing randomized multicenter collaborative open‐labeled project [...]." |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Outcomes subjective to participants | High risk | "This study was under a still ongoing randomized multicenter collaborative open‐labeled project [...]." |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Outcomes subjective to outcome assessors | Unclear risk | Insufficient information on blinding of outcome assessors |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Objective outcomes | Low risk | No known reason for bias |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Time‐to‐event data | Unclear risk | All participants were included in statistical analysis. 3 participants out of 60 were lost to follow‐up, and 20 participants died. No information on intention‐to‐treat analysis. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Patient‐reported outcomes (other than safety data) | Unclear risk | All participants were included in statistical analysis. 3 participants out of 60 were lost to follow‐up, and 20 participants died. No information on intention‐to‐treat analysis. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Safety data | Unclear risk | All participants were included in statistical analysis. 3 participants out of 60 were lost to follow‐up, and 20 participants died. No information on intention‐to‐treat analysis. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Other outcomes | Unclear risk | All participants were included in statistical analysis. 3 participants out of 60 were lost to follow‐up, and 20 participants died. No information on intention‐to‐treat analysis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Protocol available (UMIN000001137). Survival data not reported as planned. |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified |