Fiatarone 1997.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | Setting: USA N = 34 Sample: frail older people (94% women) Age (years): mean 82 (SD 1) Inclusion criteria: community‐dwelling older people; moderate to severe functional impairment Exclusion criteria: none given | |
Interventions | 1. High‐intensity progressive resistance training exercises in own home (3 day/wk for 16 wks). 2 weeks instruction and then weekly phone calls. 11 different upper and lower limb exercises with arm and leg weights 2. Control: wait list control. Weekly phone calls | |
Outcomes | 1. "Frequency of falls" but probably means fallers Other outcomes reported but not included in this review |
|
Duration of the study | 16 wks (duration of intervention) | |
Notes | Abstract only | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of randomisation not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Falls and fallers | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Fallers | Unclear risk | SeeAppendix 3 for method of assessment. Insufficient information to permit judgement. |
Risk of bias in recall of falls | Unclear risk | Interval recall. Falls identified weekly by phone call. |