Grahn Kronhed 2009.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | Setting: Linköping, Sweden
N = 73 Sample: women with osteoporosis identified from Linköping Hospital, Osteoporosis Unit files Age (years): mean 71.4, range 60 to 81 Inclusion criteria: BMD measured within previous 9 months and T‐score ≤ ‐2.5 SD Exclusion criteria: enrolled in a pharmacological RCT; requiring indoor walking aids; cognitively impaired (MMSE < 20); severe heart disease, malignancy, recent arthroplasty, unhealed fractures; unable to understand Swedish |
|
Interventions | 1. Group exercise programme (60 min, 2 x per wk, for 4 months) supervised by PT 2. Control: no intervention. Instructed not to change exercise routines for 1 year | |
Outcomes | 1. Mean number of falls (no SD reported) 2. Number sustaining a fracture Other outcomes reported but not included in this review | |
Duration of the study | 1 year | |
Notes | No participants sustained a fracture during follow‐up | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Method not described but assume it was truly random given that "An independent statistical unit randomized the participants ..." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "An independent statistical unit randomized the participants..." |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Participants and personnel not blind to allocated group but impact of non‐blinding unclear |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Falls and fallers | Low risk | Quote: "… participants were followed‐up concerning … falls … for 1 year by the independent statistical unit." Probably blind to allocated group or at least unlikely to introduce bias. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Fractures | High risk | Appear to be participant‐reported fractures with no description of confirmation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Falls | Unclear risk | SeeAppendix 3 for method of assessment. Insufficient information to permit judgement. |
Risk of bias in recall of falls | Low risk | Quote: "... participants reported number of falls each week for the 1‐year study period" |