Hauer 2001.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | Setting: Germany
N = 57
Sample: women recruited at the end of ward rehabilitation in a geriatric hospital Age (years): mean 82 (SD 4.8), range 75 to 90 Inclusion criteria: ≥ 75 years; fall(s) as reason for admission to hospital or recent history of injurious fall leading to medical treatment; residing within study community Exclusion criteria: acute neurological impairment; severe cardiovascular disease; unstable chronic or terminal illness; major depression; severe cognitive impairment; musculoskeletal impairment preventing participation in training regimen; falls known to be due to a single, identifiable disease, e.g. stroke or hypoglycaemia |
|
Interventions | 1. Exercise: group lower‐extremity progressive resistance training and progressive functional balance training, 90 min, 3 x per wk, for 12 wks
2. Control: "motor placebo", i.e. flexibility, calisthenics, ball games, and memory tasks while seated, 60 min, 3 x per wk, for 12 wks Both groups also received identical physiotherapy (25 min, 2 x per wk) |
|
Outcomes | 1. Number of people falling | |
Duration of the study | 6 months after intervention | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Stratified randomisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Control group received "placebo activities" and both groups received identical physiotherapy sessions |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Falls and fallers | Low risk | Falls reported by participants but control group received "placebo activities". Assessor was blinded. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Fallers | Low risk | SeeAppendix 3 for method of assessment |
Risk of bias in recall of falls | Low risk | Prospective. Daily diaries collected every 2 weeks. |