Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD007146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007146.pub3

Lord 1995.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT. Pre‐randomisation prior to consent, from a schedule of participants in a previous study
Participants Setting: Australia
N = 197
Sample: women recruited from a schedule from a previous epidemiologic study. Fitness level not defined.
Age (years): mean 71.6 (SD 5.4), range 60 to 85
Inclusion criteria: living independently in the community
Exclusion criteria: unable to use English
Interventions 1. Intervention: exercise classes (warm‐up, conditioning, stretching, relaxation) 1 hour, 2 x per wk for 52 wks
2. Control: no intervention
Outcomes 1. Rate of falls
2. Number of people falling
Duration of the study 1 year
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "randomly assigned"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Participants and personnel not blind to allocated group but impact of non‐blinding unclear
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Falls and fallers High risk Falls reported by participants who were aware of their group allocation. Assessors not blind to treatment status.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Falls Low risk SeeAppendix 3 for method of assessment
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Fallers Low risk SeeAppendix 3 for method of assessment
Risk of bias in recall of falls Unclear risk Interval recall. Fall ascertainment questionnaires sent out every 2 months. Telephone call if questionnaire not returned.