Cells expressed Voltron and were imaged via wide-field
epifluorescence.
(A) Top: image of the field of view. The cells are labeled at the
centroid of their footprints. Bottom: extracted single-cell traces. Insets shown
in (C) are marked in red and black.
(B) Background components from SGPMD-NMF. The two components that
explained the most variance in the movie are included, with each
component’s spatial profile above the corresponding temporal trace.
(C) Inset of eight single-cell traces over a window of approximately 3
s.
(D) Average over pixels in cell 6 in the denoised movie (mean ROI),
SGPMD-NMF reconstructed signal movie (SGPMD-NMF), reconstructed background movie
(background), and residual movie (residual).
(E) Scatterplot of the relative variance of each cell background versus
signal. Anticorrelation between relative variance of background and signal
results because together, background and signal account for >99% of the
total variance. If background and signal were uncorrelated, they would fall
along the line x + y = 1. Deviations below the line x + y = 1 indicate positive
correlation between signal and background.
(F) Top: SD image of the reconstructed sum of background and residual.
Magenta masks indicate 14 manually selected bright spots, or missed cells.
Bottom: mean ROI (on denoised movie) of the 14 missed cells. These traces showed
little or no spiking activity.
(G) Skewness of temporally high-pass-filtered mean ROI traces (on
denoised movie) of the 14 missed cells and 59 detected cells. Skewness provides
a measure of spiking activity relative to baseline noise. Error bars show mean
± SEM. The missed cells displayed substantially less spiking activity
compared with the detected cells.