. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 4.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Behav Dev. 2020 Sep 10;45(3):256–268. doi: 10.1177/0165025420949690

Table 3.

Hierarchical Multiple Regression Predicting Evaluative Thoughts and Emotions as a Function of Honor and Face Norm Endorsement in the U.S. Sample.

	Helpfu^a			Adequacy as a friend^a			Pride^b			Shame^b			Guilt^b
Norms	ΔR²	B	95% CI [LL, UL]	ΔR²	B	95% CI [LL, UL]	ΔR²	B	95% CI [LL, UL]	ΔR²	B	95% CI [LL, UL]	ΔR²	B	95% CI [LL, UL]
Avenge self	.06^***			NA			.03^*			.03^**			.02^†
Honor^c		.34^**	[0.12, 0.57]		NA			.41^*	[0.03, 0.79]		−.18	[−.42, .05]		−.27^*	[−.54, .00]
Face^c		−.36^**	[−0.62, −0.10]		NA			−.28	[−0.71, 0.14]		.29^*	[.02, .56]		.18	[−.12, .48]
Avenge peer	.05^**			.04^**			.02^†			.04^**			.02
Honor^c		.40^**	[0.19, 0.60]		.34 ^**	[0.14, 0.54]		.35^†	[−0.03, 0.73]		−.29^**	[−.50, −.08]		−.15	[−.42, .12]
Face^c		.04	[−0.19, 0.28]		−.01	[−0.24, 0.22]		−.25	[−0.68, 0.19]		.23^†	[−.01, .47]		.24	[−.07, .55]
Calm peer	.06^***			.08^***			.02^†			.04^**			.02
Honor^c		.00	[−0.13, 0.13]		−.02	[−0.13, 0.08]		−.41^*	[−0.78, −0.05]		.05^*	[.00, .09]		.04	[−.03, .12]
Face^c		.30^**	[16, 0.45]		.30^***	[0.18, 0.42]		.08	[0.33, 0.50]		−.05^*	[−.10, .00]		−.07	[−.16, .02]

Note. N = 260. CI = confidence interval.

Scale = 1 (not at all) to 5 (a lot!).

Scale = 0 (0% of experienced emotions) to 10 (100% of experienced emotions).

Scale = 1 (not true) to 6 (true).

^†

p < .10.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < .001.