Skip to main content
. 2021 May 4;83(6):2458–2472. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02303-3

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Evolution of RTs in distractor absent trials plotted as a function of the target location. Notice that the pattern of results seems to be reversed relative to Fig. 3, indicating that reduced distraction at a given location implies reduced responsiveness to the target as well. Error bars represent SEMs