Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: Processes (Basel). 2021 Feb 15;9(2):356. doi: 10.3390/pr9020356

Table 1.

Comparison of cargo loading methods.

Cell-Based Cargo Loading Methods
Method Cargo Pros Cons Reference
Passive incubation Small molecule drugs, such as doxorubicin and curcumin Simple and convenient; can be adopted by most laboratories Low loading efficiency; may affect the EV components [2225]
Transfection Biomolecules, including small RNAs, mRNA, DNAs and proteins Load large cargos; efficiency is relatively high Transfection reagent is required; loading efficiency relies on the transfection efficiency [3437,52,53,64]
Non-Cell-Based Cargo Loading Methods
Method Cargo Pros Cons Reference
Passive incubation Small molecules drugs, such as doxorubicin and curcumin Very simple; can be easily adopted by most laboratories Low loading efficiency [6871,83,93]
Transfection MiRNAs and siRNAs Load large cargos; enhanced efficiency May alter the property and structure of EVs [98,113,114]
Electroporation/Sonication/Freeze-thaw/Saponin Small molecules drugs; biomolecules, including small RNAs, mRNA, DNAs and proteins Possible to load macromolecules; loading efficiency is relatively high Increase EV instability; small RNA or EV aggregation; additional equipment or wash step may be required [61,84,86,87,90,91, 102108,137,138]