Table 1.
Comparison of cargo loading methods.
Cell-Based Cargo Loading Methods | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Method | Cargo | Pros | Cons | Reference |
Passive incubation | Small molecule drugs, such as doxorubicin and curcumin | Simple and convenient; can be adopted by most laboratories | Low loading efficiency; may affect the EV components | [22–25] |
Transfection | Biomolecules, including small RNAs, mRNA, DNAs and proteins | Load large cargos; efficiency is relatively high | Transfection reagent is required; loading efficiency relies on the transfection efficiency | [34–37,52,53,64] |
Non-Cell-Based Cargo Loading Methods | ||||
Method | Cargo | Pros | Cons | Reference |
Passive incubation | Small molecules drugs, such as doxorubicin and curcumin | Very simple; can be easily adopted by most laboratories | Low loading efficiency | [68–71,83,93] |
Transfection | MiRNAs and siRNAs | Load large cargos; enhanced efficiency | May alter the property and structure of EVs | [98,113,114] |
Electroporation/Sonication/Freeze-thaw/Saponin | Small molecules drugs; biomolecules, including small RNAs, mRNA, DNAs and proteins | Possible to load macromolecules; loading efficiency is relatively high | Increase EV instability; small RNA or EV aggregation; additional equipment or wash step may be required | [61,84,86,87,90,91, 102–108,137,138] |