Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tob Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;6(5):318–330. doi: 10.18001/TRS.6.5.2

Table 4.

Statistical Analysis Results for the Acceptability Questionnaire Items

Groupa Deviceb
Item eTop Video F p ηp2 F p ηp2
Alter Behavior 6.97 .01 0.15 6.79 .01 0.14
 ECIG-Naïve 43.9 (6.4) 28.4 (5.0)
 ECIG-Experienced 24.0 (5.4) 16.0 (4.2)
Less Likely 7.22 .01 0.15 1.37 .25 0.03
 ECIG-Naïve 28.8 (5.3) 29.9 (5.2)
 ECIG-Experienced 15.4 (4.5) 9.4 (4.4)
Reduce Enjoyment 0.32 .57 0.01 8.56 .010 0.17
 ECIG-Naïve 27.6 (6.6) 24.7 (5.3)
 ECIG-Experienced 30.7 (5.6) 13.9 (4.5)
Affect Taste 0.62 .43 0.02 3.29 .08 0.07
 ECIG-Naïve 25.4 (6.8) 17.1 (5.9)
 ECIG-Experienced 30.4 (5.7) 23.4 (5.0)
More Difficult 0.58 .45 0.01 4.12 .049 0.09
 ECIG-Naïve 20.8 (6.2) 20.0 (3.9)
 ECIG-Experienced 21.3 (5.3) 10.5 (3.3)
Increase Awareness 2.24 .14 0.05 0.53 .47 0.01
 ECIG-Naïve 45.7 (7.3) 47.9 (6.6)
 ECIG-Experienced 40.0 (6.2) 31.7 (5.6)
Like to Know More 0.45 .51 0.01 0.09 0.77 0.002
 ECIG-Naïve 60.8 (7.4) 64.9 (7.4)
 ECIG-Experienced 69.8 (6.3) 68.32 (6.3)

Note.

a:

df = (1,41)

b:

df = (2,82)