Skip to main content
. 2021 May 4;152(7):514–525.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.04.019

Table 3.

Comparison of different testing options for COVID-19.

DESCRIPTION NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST ANTIGENT TEST ANTIBODY TEST
Test Type Viral, molecular Viral, immunoassay Serologic, immunoassay
Purpose Diagnostic Diagnostic, screening Screening
Intended Use Detect current infection Detect current infection Detect prior or recent infection
Analyte Detected Viral RNA Viral structural proteins Virus-specific antibodies
Sensitivity Generally high Moderate to high Moderate to high
Specificity High High High
Test Complexity Differs by test Relatively easy to use Relatively easy to use
Turnaround Time 15 min to > 2 d 15 min to > 2 d 15 min to > 2 d
Operating Temperature Need thermal cycling—some are isothermal Ambient Ambient
Results Presentation Quantitative or qualitative Visual or instrument read Visual or instrument read
Authorized for Point-of-careUse Some tests Most tests Some tests
Authorized for Use at Home Very few, sample collection is possible at home for many tests Some tests No
Suggested Test Time 1 d after infection to 14 d from symptom onset 5-7 d from symptom onset ≥ 15 d from symptom onset
Cost per Test Moderate (≈ $100-$200) Low (≈ $5-$50) Moderate (≈ $100-$200)
Authorized Specimen Type Nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, nasal, sputum, saliva Nasopharyngeal, nasal Whole blood, serum, plasma, fingerstick blood
Transport Medium Viral transport medium or saline—nothing needed for some tests Extraction medium Anticoagulant—nothing needed for fingerstick tests
Disadvantages High requirements for operators and laboratory conditions. High cost, complexity, and turnaround time Less sensitive in the early stage of disease Lower sensitivity and specificity. Cross-reactivity. Long window period