Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;113(5):532–542. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa174

Table 5.

PROEAS item reporting for randomized clinical trials (n = 14)a

Variable No. (%)
Taxonomy of research objectives
 PRO endpoints were specified in the trial protocol 14 (100)
 Hypothesis requirement was met as needed 9 (64.3)
 Endpoints were used to make appropriate conclusions 9 (64.3)
 Direction of the hypothesis was prespecified in the trial protocol if required 9 (64.3)
 Clinical relevance for between-group differences was prespecified in the trial protocol 1 (7.1)
 Within-treatment group objective stated in the trial protocol 5 (35.7)
 Clinical relevance for within-patient or within–treatment group change was predefined in the trial protocol 7 (50.0)
Recommending statistical methods
 Statistical test comparing 2 groups done when appropriate 13 (92.9)
 Provided P values for statistical significance 12 (85.7)
 Tests used adjusted for baseline covariates 13 (92.9)
 Tests used handled clustered data (repeated assessments) 12 (85.7)
 Correction for multiple testing done appropriately 3 (21.4)
 Used at least 1 appropriate statistical test to evaluate the tested outcome 12 (85.7)
Standardizing statistical terms related to missing data
 A definition for missing data was reported 0
 Study did not consider PRO assessments for deceased patients as missing data 1 (7.1)
 Variable denominator rate reported 9 (64.3)
 Fixed denominator rate reported 6 (42.9)
 Absolute numbers for both numerators and denominators were reported 11 (78.6)
 A CONSORT diagram or table reporting reasons for treatment discontinuation was provided 9 (64.3)
General handling of missing data
 Study documented a priori the approach for handling missing data 4 (28.6)
 Item-level missing data handled according to the scoring algorithm of the instrument 3 (21.4)
 A method that allows the use of all available data was used to approach missing data 1 (7.1)
 Study did not use explicit imputation methods unless justified 7 (50.0)
 At least 2 different approaches to handle missing data were used 5 (35.7)
a

CONSORT = Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; PRO = patient-reported outcome; PROEAS = Patient Reported Outcomes Endpoints Analysis Score; SISAQOL = Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data.