Skip to main content
. 2021 May 4;13:122. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00615-5

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Anisotropic sensing performance of the sensor. a Relative resistance changes as a function of strain in L- and T-directions. b Relative resistance changes under 80% strain at different frequencies. c Relative resistance changes under repeated cycles at different strains. d Selectivity calculated from the linear fit of ΔGF versus loading direction data. e Comparison of GF, selectivity, and working range with existing anisotropic strain sensors in the literature. The highlighted blue and pink regions represent sensors with crack-based and aligned structures, respectively