Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 21;11:632094. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.632094

Table 2.

Statistical comparison of survival data according to both WT1 and FLT3/ITD status.

Comparison EFS hazard ratio (95% CI) EFS OS hazard ratio OS
P-value (95% CI) P-value
FLT3/ITD(-):
WT1 wildtype vs WT1 mutant		 1.861(1.197-2.892) 0.006 1.600(0.933-2.744) 0.088
FLT3/ITD(+):
WT1 wildtype vs WT1 mutant		 2.179(1.364-3.482) 0.001 2.225(1.305-3.796) 0.003
WT1 wildtype:
FLT3/ITD(-)vs FLT3/ITD(+)		 1.386(1.075-1.788) 0.012 1.305(0.961-1.771) 0.088
WT1 mutant:
FLT3/ITD(-) vs FLT3/ITD(+)		 1.605(0.886-2.906) 0.118 1.748(0.870-3.514) 0.117

CI, confidence interval; EFS, event-free survival; FLT3/ITD, internal tandem duplication of the FLT3 gene; OS, overall survival.