Table 5.
Peer review of OCD prototype and evaluation by co-designers
| Group number (Gn) | Peer reviewers | Sample of evaluation remarks by student reviewers |
|---|---|---|
| Gn1 | Gn3 |
“I don't understand what you meant by the question point and the puzzle point.” “…in the first game I did not notice any form of reward for the player.” [Gn3] |
| Gn2 | Gn1 |
“very good idea” “This is an incredibly brilliant game Idea. I love it.” [Gn1] |
| Gn3 | Gn2 |
“… not able to get the info on time” “The game was not well explained.” “The diagrams were not explaining the game, rather explaining the work through the game.” “The write-up was not properly structured…” [Gn2] |