Skip to main content
. 2021 May 5;26(5):5815–5849. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10515-1

Table 5.

Peer review of OCD prototype and evaluation by co-designers

Group number (Gn) Peer reviewers Sample of evaluation remarks by student reviewers
Gn1 Gn3

“I don't understand what you meant by the question point and the puzzle point.”

“…in the first game I did not notice any form of reward for the player.”

[Gn3]

Gn2 Gn1

“very good idea”

“This is an incredibly brilliant game Idea. I love it.”

[Gn1]

Gn3 Gn2

“… not able to get the info on time”

“The game was not well explained.”

“The diagrams were not explaining the game, rather explaining the work through the game.”

“The write-up was not properly structured…”

[Gn2]