Skip to main content
. 2021 May 4;16:40. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00377-8

Table 4.

Comparison of attributes resilience scores and relapse risk score

(n = 52)
Items Bidimensional Resilience Scale Stimulant Relapse Risk Scale
n Innate resilience factors Acquired resilience factors
mean ± SD P value mean ± SD P value mean ± SD P value
Sex
 Male 46 35.7 ± 7.5 0.442 29.3 ± 4.6 0.612 66.8 ± 12.4 0.645
 Female 6 33.2 ± 5.3 30.3 ± 5.2 69. 6 ± 14.4
Employment status
 Yes 17 37.1 ± 7.1 0.287 29.1 ± 4.7 0.754 60.3 ± 9.7 0.005**
 No 35 34.6 ± 7.3 29.6 ± 4.7 70.9 ± 12.4
Presence of key person
 Yes 49 35.4 ± 7.4 0.988 29.3 ± 4.7 0.218 66.7 ± 12.2 0.762
 No 2 35.5 ± 6.4 33.5 ± 0.7 64.0 ± 11.3
Living with someone
 Yes 45 35.8 ± 7.3 0.255 29.6 ± 4.8 0.498 66.6 ± 12.8 0.443
 No 7 31.8 ± 6.6 28.3 ± 4.2 70.8 ± 10.4
Treatment state
 Under medical treatment 38 35.7 ± 7.6 0.348 29.2 ± 4.6 0.492 67.1 ± 13.8 0.751
 Untreated and cessation of treatment 7 34.0 ± 0.0 27.0 ± 0.0 64.0 ± 0.0
Comorbid mental illness
 Yes 14 37.2 ± 8.2 0.375 29.4 ± 4.2 0.946 60.8 ± 14.0 0.044*
 No 33 34.9 ± 7.2 29.5 ± 5.0 68.8 ± 10.2
Physical disorders
 Yes 14 36.1 ± 6.9 0.795 28.4 ± 3.8 0.431 70.0 ± 14.7 0.430
 No 33 35.6 ± 7.6 29.8 ± 4.9 65.8 ± 11.5

n number of participants

Statistical evaluation is performed by the Student’s t-test. *P < 0.5, **P < 0.01

We have used a pairwise method, so the total number is different