Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 9;8(2):160–165. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2020.1826840

Table 1.

Outcome variables at baseline (brief exposure with basal metabolic rate), following prolonged exposure (with exercise-induced hyperthermia) and intervention-control (interaction) comparisons

 
Control
Facemask
Facemask main effect
Outcome variables at rest (SD)
Rectal temperature (ºC) 37.5 (0.3) 37.3 (0.2) p = 0.04
Skin temperature (ºC) 34.9 (0.6) 34.7 (0.6) p = 0.50
Under mask site temperature (ºC) 36.0 (0.6) 36.1 (0.5) p = 0.59
Outside mask site temperature (ºC) 36.2 (0.7) 36.3 (0.4) p = 0.24
Dyspnea (%) 6.8 (13.2) 8.5 (9.9) p = 0.08
Whole-body thermal discomfort (%) 42.8 (21.2) 39.8 (13.6) p = 0.51
Facial thermal discomfort (%) 41.6 (18.6) 49.4 (22.4) p = 0.23
Simple-motor performance (%) 96.8 (1.5) 98.0 (0.7) p = 0.20
Complex-motor performance (%) 75.1 (5.8) 74.9 (4.5) p = 0.87
Math calculation (%) 97.9 (1.6) 98.2 (2.7) p = 0.75
Math-motor task performance (%) 94.5 (4.4) 93.1 (4.9) p = 0.16
Combined cognitive score (%) 91.1 (1.9) 91.1 (1.7) p = 0.58
Outcome variables following exercise (SD)
  Control Facemask Exposure main effect
Rectal temperature (ºC) 38.4 (0.6) 38.2 (0.4) p < 0.001
Skin temperature (ºC) 36.6 (0.5) 36.6 (0.6) p < 0.001
Under mask site temperature (ºC) 36.9 (0.7) 36.6 (0.6) p = 0.02
Outside mask site temperature (ºC) 37.2 (0.2) 36.9 (0.6) p < 0.001
Dyspnea (%) 21.4 (14.5) 51.3 (27.6) p < 0.001
Whole-body thermal discomfort (%) 66.8 (17.6) 63.2 (19.2) p < 0.01
Facial thermal discomfort (%) 64.3 (17.9) 78.3 (17.3) p < 0.001
Simple-motor performance (%) 96.9 (1.7) 97.0 (1.7) p = 0.22
Complex-motor performance (%) 74.8 (6.7) 75.4 (4.1) p = 0.89
Math calculation (%) 98.2 (1.8) 97.4 (1.8) p = 0.60
Math-motor task performance (%) 95.7 (2.0) 93.4 (4.8) p = 0.50
Cognition (%) 91.4 (1.8) 90.8 (1.7) p = 0.93
Control-facemask comparisons [95%CI]
  Mean difference Facemask-exposure interaction
Rectal temperature (ºC) −0.1 [−0.4, 0.2] p = 0.55  
Skin temperature (ºC) 0.1 [−0.6, 0.8] p = 0.77  
Under mask site temperature (ºC) −0.24 [−1.0, 0.6] p = 0.50  
Outside mask site temperature (ºC) −0.5 [−1.4, 0.5] p = 0.29  
Dyspnea (%) 28.3 [1.0, 55.5] p = 0.04  
Whole-body thermal discomfort (%) −0.6 [−23.8, 22.5] p = 0.95  
Facial thermal discomfort (%) 6.1 [−16.6, 28.9] p = 0.54  
  Mean difference Facemask-exposure interaction
Simple-motor performance (%) −1.0 [−2.5, 0.4] p = 0.14  
Complex-motor performance (%) 0.9 [−0.7, 2.5] p = 0.23  
Math calculation (%) 1.1 [−3.7, 1.5] p = 0.34  
Math-motor task performance (%) −1.0 [−7.9, 6.0] p = 0.75  
Cognition (%) −0.6 [−2.7, 1.6] p = 0.55  

N.B. p values provided in the top and middle sections of the table are for the ANOVA main effects of facemask use (control vs facemask) and exposure (rest vs exercise, respectively). Mean differences, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) and p values in the bottom section are representative of the comparisons of change from rest to exercise between the control and facemask trial, as recommended for clinical practice.