Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nutr Res. 2021 Apr 21;89:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2021.01.001

Table 2.

Multivariable-adjusted association between total magnesium intake and the Cook-Medley hostility scale over a 5-year follow-up*

Quintiles of total magnesium intake (mg/1000 kcal/day) Plinear-trend
Q1 (lowest) Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 (highest)
No. of participants 943 943 944 943 943 --
No. of observations 1,724 1,723 1,723 1,724 1,724 --
Total magnesium intake (mg/1000 kcal/day)
 Median 93.4 114.0 133.2 156.5 199.4 --
 Range 41.8 105.0 105.0–123.0 123.1–144.2 144.2–173.2 173.2–887.7 --
Model 1 0(Ref.) −1.33 (−1.98, −0.67) −1.71 (−2.37, −1.05) −1.80 (−2.49 −1.12) −2.62 (−3.33, −1.90) <0.0001
Model 2§ 0(Ref.) −1.28 (−1.92, −0.65) −1.45 (−2.09, −0.81) −1.41 (−2.08, −0.75) −2.16 (−2.85, −1.47) <0.0001
Model 3a|| 0(Ref.) −1.31 (−1.95, −0.68) −1.48 (−2.12, −0.84) −1.47 (−2.14, −0.80) −2.21 (−2.91, −1.52) <0.0001
Model 3b** 0(Ref.) −1.01 (−1.65, −0.36) −0.97 (−1.65, −0.30) −0.82 (−1.54, −0.10) −1.55 (−2.31, −0.78) <0.001
Model 3c†† 0(Ref.) −0.98 (−1.63, −0.33) −0.98 (−1.6 7, −0.29) −0.81 (−1.54, −0.08) −1.45 (−2.23, −0.67) <0.05
Model 3d†† 0(Ref.) −1.01 (−1.64, −0.37) −0.94 (−1.60, −0.27) −0.75 (−1.46, −0.04) −1.43 (−2.19, −0.67) <0.05
Model 4§§ 0(Ref.) −0.81 (−1.44, −0.18) −0.70 (−1.37, −0.03) −1.13 (−1.84, −0.42) −1.02 (−1.78, −0.25) <0.05
Model 5|||| 0(Ref.) 0.11 (−0.52, 0.73) −0.11 (−0.75, 0.54) −0.63 (−1.27, 0.01) −0.54 (−1.21, 0.12) <0.01
Model 6*** 0(Ref.) −0.30 (−0.80, 0.20) 0.15 (−0.48, 0.78) −0.09 (−0.75, 0.56) 0.68 (−0.08, 1.45) 0.41

Abbreviations: CARDIA, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults; CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression; CI, confidence interval; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LCn3PUFA, long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; No., number; Ref., reference; Q, quintile.

*

The study population included 4,716 individuals from the CARDIA study. The statistics for each model were reported using β coefficients and 95% confident intervals (CIs). All models were constructed using generalized estimating equations method.

P for linear trend was tested using the continuous values of exposure of interest with its extreme values >99th excluded.

Model 1 was adjusted for time (year 0 and 5), age (continuous), gender, race (white or black), and center.

§

Model 2 was additionally adjusted for education level (continuous), smoking status (never, ever, or current smokers), alcohol consumption (0, 0.1–11.9, 12.0–23.9 or ≥ 24 g/day), body mass index (<18.5, 18.5–24.9, 25–29.9, or ≥30 kg/m2), physical activity (quintiles), and systolic blood pressure (quintiles).

||

Model 3a was additionally adjusted for LCn3PUFA intake (quintiles).

**

Model 3b replaced LCn3PUFA intake with a priori diet quality score (quintiles).

††

Model 3c was additionally adjusted for LDL-C/HDL-C ratio (quintile), cholesterol (quintile), and insulin (quintile).

††

Model 3d was additionally adjusted for depression (CES-D<16, or ≥16).

§§

Model 4 replaced total magnesium with dietary magnesium intake (in nutrient density form) with additional adjustment for supplementation status (yes, or no).

||||

Model 5 replaced total magnesium with whole grain intake (quintiles).

***

Model 6 replaced total magnesium with coffee consumption [0(ref.), 0.1–0.9, 1.0–1.9, 2.03.9, ≥4 servings/day)].