Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 21;15:670699. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.670699

Table 4.

ANOVA and post hoc t-test results of the analysis of MWM data in case of iTBS applied to juvenile rats, using factors Group (MIA, controls) and Days (1–4).

ANOVA t-test MIA vs. controls (sign. cases)
Parameter Factor DF F-value p-value η2 Parameter DF T-value p-value d
Time to target
Day 3 32.796 <0.001 0.384 Day 2 23 2.672 0.009 0.59
Group 3 1.184 0.315 0.013 Day 4 23 2.239 0.028 0.37
Day × Group 9 0.748 0.665 0.001
Path length
Day 3 99.787 <0.001 0.272 Day 4 23 2.323 0.022 0.46
Group 3 2.294 0.077 0.009
Day × Group 9 0.913 0.513 0.010
Mean Speed
Day 3 8.730 <0.001 0.033 Day 4 23 2.134 0.035 0.45
Group 3 0.976 0.404 0.004
Day × Group 9 1.431 0.170 0.017
Perform. type
Day 3 69.950 <0.001 0.223 Day 4 23 2.362 0.020 0.48
Group 3 0.613 0.606 0.003
Day × Group 9 1.001 0.437 0.012

DF, degrees of freedom; η2, partial ETA; d, Cohen’s d; p-values of significant cases (<0.05) are shown in bold font.