Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 26;24:711–727. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.01.026

Table 1.

Comparison of lipid metabolism related indexes in chow-fed and HFD-fed mice

Group TG (mM) TC (mM) HDL-C (mM) LDL-C (mM) HDL-C/LDL-C ALT (U/L) AST (U/L)
chow 1.04 ± 0.08 2.96 ± 0.31 2.95 ± 0.36 0.27 ± 0.03 11.15 ± 2.23 80.52 ± 13.39 93.80 ± 14.21
HFD 1.42 ± 0.15∗∗∗ 6.04 ± 0.42∗∗∗ 3.26 ± 0.32 0.82 ± 0.11∗∗∗ 4.03 ± 0.58∗∗∗ 130.48 ± 16.57∗∗∗ 150.15 ± 20.46∗∗∗

∗∗∗p < 0.001 versus chow-fed mice. Measurement data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and data comparison between two groups was conducted using independent sample t test. n = 10. HFD, high-fat diet; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; PPARα, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha; sh-NC, short hairpin RNA-negative control.