Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 20;25:100394. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100394

Table 3.

Treatment engagement, completion, and satisfaction by group.

Variable All sample
(N = 434)
MI + iCBT group
(n = 203)
iCBT only group
(n = 231)
Statistical significance
n % n % n %
Engagement
 Mean number of course logins 19.42 (11.56) 20.69 (12.79) 18.29 (10.25) t(432) = 1.92, p = 0.06
 Mean days between first and last login 58.09 (29.28) 61.08 (28.88) 54.42 (25.64) t(432) = 2.54, p < 0.01
 Mean number of messages sent to therapist 3.49 (2.83) 3.56 (3.01) 3.43 (2.66) t(432) = 0.15, p = 0.88
 Mean number of messages received from therapist 8.77 (1.49) 8.75 (1.42) 8.78 (1.56) t(432) = −0.21, p = 0.81
Completion
 Mean number of lessons accessed at post-treatment 4.29 (1.20) 4.35 (1.13) 4.23 (1.26) t(432) = 1.12, p = 0.23
 Accessed ≥4 lessons at post-treatment 344 79% 168 83% 176 76% χ2 (1) = 2.84, p = 0.09
 Accessed 5 lessons at post-treatment 287 66% 138 68% 149 65% χ2 (1) = 0.58, p = 0.45
Satisfactiona
 Recommend course to others 276 97% 135 98% 141 97% χ2 (1) = 4.10, p = 0.52
 Course worth their time 277 98% 133 96% 144 99% χ2 (1) = 1.50, p = 0.22

Note. MI = motivational interviewing; iCBT = Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy. While independent samples t-tests were primarily performed on transformed dependent variables, means and standard deviations are reported for non-transformed data in order to facilitate interpretation of results.

a

Analyses were performed on subsample of clients who completed the treatment satisfaction questions (n = 284).