Skip to main content
. 2021 May 6;29(2):220–229. doi: 10.1007/s12529-021-09999-5

Table 2.

Feasibility, acceptability, and usability survey results (N = 32 logged in with full or partial data)

Mean (minimum, maximum)
HEALED intervention acceptability survey*
The exercises in the HEALED intervention were too difficult 1.60 (1.0, 3.0)
The information shared through HEALED motivated me to be more active 3.77 (1.0, 4.0)
The HEALED intervention helped me realize that exercise is safe and beneficial for cancer survivors 3.44 (1.0, 5.0)
Being a HEALED participant is enjoyable 3.62 (2.0, 5.0)
I would like to use this website frequently 2.65 (1.0, 5.0)
HEALED website usability survey*
I think that I would like to use this website regularly 3.04 (2.0, 5.0)
I found this website unnecessarily complex 1.87 (1.0, 4.0)
This website was easy to use 3.78 (1.0, 5.0)
I think I would need assistance to be able to use this website 1.30 (1.0, 3.0)
I found the various functions in this website were well integrated 3.22 (2.0, 5.0)
I thought there was too much inconsistency in this website 1.96 (1.0, 3.0)
I would imagine that most people would learn to use this website very quickly 3.78 (3.0, 5.0)
I found this website very cumbersome to use 2.04 (1.0, 4.0)
I felt confident using this website 3.57 (1.0, 5.0)
I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this website 1.39 (1.0, 3.0)
Usability total score 72.08 (67, 78)
HEALED website user statistics Median (Q1, Q3)
Number of logins per person over 12-week intervention 4 (1, 8)
Time logged in (minutes) per session 16 (6, 31)
Total time logged in (sum of login times from each login, in minutes) 95 (11, 204)

*1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree