Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 31;5(5):e263–e276. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00001-2

Table 5.

Process indicators on implementation fidelity and exposure to interventions

Control AGRI AGRI-NUT AGRI-NUT+PLA
Quality of implementation: internal monitoring data
Number of events (video or PLA meetings) achieved in the 32-month implementation period NA 16 551/16 996 (97%) 15 790/16 156 (98%) 13 986/14 162 (99%)
Structured observations of video dissemination quality in the last 6 months and quality score achieved*
Grade A NA 51/51 (100%) 57/57 (100%) 40/40 (100%)
Grade B NA 0/51 (0%) 0/57 (0%) 0/40 (0%)
Grade C NA 0/51 (0%) 0/57 (0%) 0/40 (0%)
Exposure to interventions: endline survey data
Active self-help group members 458/997 (46%) 530/1100 (48%) 537/1055 (51%) 546/1139 (48%)
Went to any video dissemination or PLA meeting in last 6 months 21/997 (2%) 548/1100 (50%) 607/1055 (58%) 632/1139 (55%)
Mean number of events (video or PLA meetings) attended in last 6 months; range 0–11 0·1 (0·8), n=997 3·3 (4·0), n=1100 4·4 (4·5), n=1055 3·6 (3·9), n=1139

Data are n/N (%) or mean (SD). NSA=nutrition-sensitive agriculture. AGRI=group assigned to NSA videos. AGRI-NUT=group assigned to NSA and nutrition-specific videos. AGRI-NUT+PLA=group assigned to NSA videos and nutrition-specific participatory learning and action (PLA) cycle meetings and videos.

*

The assessor scored eight parameters relating to the facilitator's ability as 0 (poor), 1 (good), or 2 (very good), for grades C, B, and A, respectively. Parameters were handling and setting up equipment; preparing the meeting venue; introducing the video topic; pausing the video during screening to check understanding and answer questions; encouraging the adoption of practices shown in the video; summarising the video; answering questions requiring subject knowledge; and filling out a form about the dissemination. Video disseminations scoring a total of 12 points or more achieved grade A (high quality), 6–11 points achieved grade B, and 0–7 points achieved grade C.