Skip to main content
. 2021 May 5;7:48. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00256-2

Table 5.

Correlations of CINSARC classes with therapeutic response/vulnerability in Luminal B breast cancers.

Therapies Characteristics N CINSARC classes p-value
Low-risk High-risk
Chemotherapy 107-gene signature No pCR-like 1587 663 (83%) 924 (75%) 1.43E−04
pCR-like 441 140 (17%) 301 (25%)
pCR No pCR 124 49 (88%) 75 (80%) 0.270
pCR 26 7 (12%) 19 (20%)
Hormone therapy E2F4-activation signature Low 496 348 (43%) 148 (12%) 3.73E−57
High 1532 455 (57%) 1077 (88%)
CDK4/6 inhibitors RBsig signature Score 2028 0.01 (−0.9–1.6) 0.44 (−0.6–2.6) 1.57E−100
E2F regulon signature Score 2028 0.11 (−0.6–0.6) 0.3 (−0.5–0.73) 5.36E−56
PARP inhibitors HRD signature Low 248 94 (94%) 154 (81%) 2.59E−03
High 42 6 (6%) 36 (19%)
Immune checkpoint inhibitorss ICR signature Score 2028 −0.33 (−2.31–2.6) −0.21 (−1.8–3.1) 8.07E−04
TIS signature Score 2028 −0.35 (−2.3–2.2) −0.24 (−2.1–2.8) 2.68E−03
TLS signature Score 2028 −0.32 (−2.2–1.8) −0.17 (−3.2–2.3) 1.69E−05
IA ESCAT alterations ERBB2 amplification1 No 764 305 (100%) 459 (98%) 0.156
Yes 8 1 (0%) 7 (2%)
PIK3CA mutation No 575 219 (72%) 356 (76%) 0.151
(E542K, E545K/A, H1047R/L) Yes 197 87 (28%) 110 (24%)
IIA ESCAT alterations ESR1 mutation No 772 306 (100%) 466 (100%)
(E380Q, Y537S/C/N, D538G) Yes 0 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
PTEN loss2 No 766 305 (100%) 461 (99%) 0.411
Yes 6 1 (0%) 5 (1%)
IIB ESCAT alterations AKT1 mutation No 752 296 (97%) 456 (98%) 0.361
(E17K) Yes 20 10 (3%) 10 (2%)
ERBB2 mutation3 No 761 302 (99%) 459 (98%) 1
Yes 11 4 (1%) 7 (2%)

pCR: pathological complete response; 1: >= 6 copies; 2homozigous deletion, truncated mutations and kown inactivating missense mutations (e.g., R130Q/G); 3hotspot activating missense mutations (e.g., S310F/Y, L755S, V777L), inframe insertion exon 2 O (e.g., Y772_A775dup).