Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Nov 6;41(2):515–525. doi: 10.1177/0733464820971134

Table 2.

Correlates of ineligibilitya for financial resources among a national sample of family caregivers

OR (95% CI) AME (95% CI)
Caregiver Characteristics
Gender (female vs. male) 0.98 (0.66, 1.44) 0.00 (−0.05, 0.04)
Race/ethnicity (vs. white non-Hispanic)
 Black (non-Hispanic) 1.53 (0.91, 2.60) 0.05 (−0.02, 0.12)
 Hispanic 1.74 (1.02, 2.96) 0.07 (0.00, 0.14) ƚ
 Other 1.54 (0.83, 2,85) 0.05 (−0.03, 0.13)
Married (yes vs. no) 1.69 (1.04, 2.75) 0.06 (0.01, 0.11) *
Education
 High school or less REF
 Some college/tech school 1.28 (0.81, 2.03) 0.03 (−0.03, 0.09)
 College graduate or more 0.65 (0.38, 1.10) −0.05 (−0.11, 0.01)
Employment (not employed vs. employed) 0.38 (0.24, 0.60) −0.11 (−0.16, −0.06) ***
Income
 <$15,000 2.83 (1.26, 6.38) 0.14 (0.03, 0.25) *
 $15.000–$29,999 1.37 (0.68, 2.78) 0.04 (−0.05, 0.12)
 $30,000–$49,999 0.85 (0.42, 1.75) −0.02 (−0.09, 0.06)
 $50,000–$74,999 1.53 (0.84, 2.81) 0.05 (−0.02, 0.12)
 $75,000–$99,999 1.26 (0.66, 2.4) 0.03 (−0.05, 0.10)
 $100,000+ REF
Care Recipient Characteristics
Gender (female vs. male) 1.07 (0.72, 1.58) 0.01 (−0.04, 0.05)
Caregiving Characteristics
Primary Caregiver (yes vs. no) 1.28 (0.83, 1.98) 0.03 (−0.02, 0.08)
Hours per week 0.95 (0.87, 1.03) −0.01 (−0.02, 0.00)
Duration (years) 0.75 (0.64, 0.87) −0.03 (−0.05, −0.02) ***
 Squared term 1.02 (1.01, 1.04) 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) ***
 Cubed term 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) **
Coresident (yes vs. no) 2.11 (1.27, 3.50) 0.09 (0.03, 0.16) **
Relationship
 Spouse/partner 2.01 (1.03, 3.92) 0.08 (−0.01, 0.17) ƚ
 Parent/in-law REF
 Child 2.69 (1.29, 5.64) 0.13 (0.02, 0.24) *
 Sibling 6.27 (3.11, 12.64) 0.28 (0.15, 0.4) ***
 Friend/non-relative 2.86 (1.63, 5.02) 0.14 (0.05, 0.22) ***
 Other relative 0.66 (0.31, 1.42) −0.04 (−0.1, 0.03)
Short Term Physical Condition (yes vs. no) 1.23 (0.77, 1.96) 0.03 (−0.03, 0.08)
Long-term physical condition (yes vs. no) 0.71 (0.44, 1.12) −0.04 (−0.1, 0.01) ƚ
Emotional or Mental Health Problem (yes vs. no) 2.25 (1.42, 3.55) 0.11 (0.04, 0.17) **
Developmental or Intellectual Disorder (yes vs. no) 1.29 (0.62, 2.69) 0.03 (−0.07, 0.13)
Behavioral Issue (yes vs. no) 0.8 (0.41, 1.55) −0.03 (−0.1, 0.05)
ADLs 0.98 (0.87, 1.09) 0.00 (−0.02, 0.01)
IADLs 0.96 (0.86, 1.09) 0.00 (−0.02, 0.01)

Note: Data are from Caregiving in the US 2015 (n=1,185); all estimates are weighted to account for the complex sampling frame and survey non-response. ORs were calculated using multivariable logistic regression and indicate the odds of ineligibility associated with each characteristic, controlling for all other characteristics in the table. OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval; AME: Average marginal effect; REF: Reference category; ADL: Count of limitations in activities of daily living; IADL: Count of limitations in instrumental activities of daily living.

ƚ

p<0.10,

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001.

a

Eligible caregivers were: 1) providing care to someone age 60+; or 2) providing care to someone with Alzheimer’s or dementia; or 3) age 55+ and providing care to an adult relative.