Why carry out this study? |
Despite the advantages associated with glycemic control, previous research has found that treatment delays are common in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). |
This study examines the relationship between treatment with oral glucose-lowering agents (GLAs) and glycemic control. |
What was learned from the study? |
Among the 4156 individuals included in the study, half of all patients were found to have sustained HbA1c above the target level, defined as ≥ 2 sequential hemoglobin A1c ( HbA1c) results above target, after 3 years; and among such patients, the average number of days that HbA1c remained above target was 1026 (2.8 years). |
Only 36% of patients with sustained HbA1c above target added a GLA to their treatment regimen, and for patients who did add such a therapy, the average number of days from identification of HbA1c above target until such treatment intensification was 401 days (1.1 years). |
Multivariable analyses revealed that, among those with sustained HbA1c ≥ 7%, treatment with more classes of oral GLAs was associated with a significantly higher glycemic burden and significantly lower odds of clinical inertia. |
The results of this study illustrate the large glycemic burden and clinical inertia towards treatment intensification associated with the use of oral GLAs. |