Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr;12(Suppl 1):S32–S44. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2020-04

Table 1. Treatment and outcome of studies focusing on patients with gastric cancer with positive cytology or peritoneal metastasis treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapeutic.

Author Year Trial Inclusion criteria Total number of patients Comparative study Response rate (%) Treatment plan Median overall survival P value
Ishigami 2010 Phase II Cyto pos/PM 40 Phase II 56–62 Chemo 22.6
Fujiwara 2012 Phase II Cyto pos/PM 18 Phase II 62.5–78 Chemo–Surgery–Chemo 24.6
Imano 2012 Phase II PM 15 Phase II n.a. Chemo 15.8
Fushida 2013 Phase II PM 27 Phase II 22–51.9 Chemo–Surgery–Chemo 16.2
Yamaguchi 2013 Phase II PM 35 Phase II 68–97 Chemo–Surgery–Chemo 17.6
Ishigami 2017 Phase II Cyto pos/PM 100 Phase II 64 Chemo–Surgery–Chemo 30.5 months (23.6–37.7)
Ishigami 2018 Phase III PM 164 IP + IV + S1 76 Chemo 17.7 0.08
IV + S1 Chemo 15.2
Yonemura 2020 NRCT Cyto pos/PM 419 no 64.1 Chemo–Surgery–Chemo CC-0: 20.5
CC-1: 12.0
<0.001

Cyto pos, positive cytology; PM, peritoneal metastasis; NRCT, non-randomized controlled trial; IP, intraperitoneally; IV, intravenously; S1, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil; n.a., not available.